Are these Square Wires 2.0? Thanks for help with identification. It's a great show, by the way (Califonication).





Sorry about starting a new thread for this one. The threads get hard for me to follow when they become very long.
Thanks!

Why.

I don't know what they are, but I'm sure they're not square wire 2.0

Nik's right.

Maybe nanowire?

why 8.0 or 8.1 8.2 something like that !

Has it been confirmed those glasses are Oakley? Maybe it's just the angle or the lower resolution, but it doesn't look like one to me.

If it is Oakley, the closest thing would likely be the Nanowire 4.0 or something similar, though there is more curvature on it than what's apparent from the one in the pic. In fact,most of the glasses Oakley has put out with similar styling would have a higher base curve than what appears in the pic. But like I said, could be the angle of the pic.

I'd guess a Why 8.2 Black/Amber Black Iridium Polarized.

Sorry Netflix isn't higher resolution on my iPad. Thanks for your help, guys. I think it's a nanowire. Looks like those aren't sold anymore. I've learned the hard way not to buy out of production glasses because when they break, they don't always have spare parts.

I am actually almost sure, that if it's an O that i surely isn't a Nanowire. They are more aerodynamic, I'd also go for a why 8.2

If its an O, I'm pretty sure it's Why 8.2.

The earstems look a bit too thick and where the earstem attaches to the lens also seems to thick to be the 8.2

Hmmmm

Those are Why's...but the Nano will give you a similar look.

And come on...no one felt like responding to Nik with the words "Because he wants to know!"

I think it's a full frame pair, not rimless. You can barely see them frame and lens separation on the right portion. At least that's what it looks like.

And the more I look at them, the more I'm convinced they aren't Oakley. The temple/hinge is too "blocky" and extends too far to be something out of Oakley's design language.

I'm starting to lean in that direction too, and because of the same reasoning.

If they are O - then they are Why. Tough to say if they are O.

They aren't O. I have that pair and the nose piece is all wrong in that pic. The O pair connecting bar is higher on the lens and a different color.

Definitely not O. My guess would be an Oliver Peoples as most are in these shows.

They had a frame. Why doesn't.

I don't remember Nano even having an Ice or blue anyway.

That's no O. A quick google search and about 10 min of investigation turn up that they are a discontinued IZOD sunglass.