I just bought this eBay listing https://www.ebay.com/itm/114969697047. I was so excited to get what I've been looking for for 5+ years, that I didn't read the whole listing. I just know what the sunglasses look like instantly and these are the SW 2.0 to the best of my ability and not EW 2.1 as the seller has stated.

Am I wrong??

What I think the listing shows:
http://www.o-review.com/database_detail_colorway.php?ID=465&table_name=glasses

EWs do NOT have socks like the image shown, but SQ does. I'm not going to say anything to the seller, since I can always claim that the item didn't match the description. In case he does send me the EWs.

I just bought this eBay listing https://www.ebay.com/itm/114969697047. I was so excited to get what I've been looking for for 5+ years, that I didn't read the whole listing. I just know what the sunglasses look like instantly and these are the SW 2.0 to the best of my ability and not EW 2.1 as the seller has stated.

Am I wrong??

What I think the listing shows:
http://www.o-review.com/database_detail_colorway.php?ID=465&table_name=glasses - digispin

The eBay link goes nowhere

E Wire 2.1 has “dog-leg” earstems, whereas SW2 does not.

Here are some screen captures:

That’s Square Wire in the wrong box.

Yes, the E Wire 2.1 has sort of an asymmetrical trapezoid shape.

This is the one that belongs to that box…

So if the square wire is the one I want, I should go for it. I've never seen them for under $300.