Pls edit the OD EAGLE of Fuel Cell. SKU:009096-90
The picture is a gascan multicam ...

Thanks in advance

Fixed. Added the Polarized one too.

Holy giant picture, Batman!

I'm not kidding when I say that it took me 20 minutes to finally acquire that photo. I had to track network packets in order to find the one call it made to the dynamic zoom, and then capture the image it returned, which was in itself dynamically created.

When can we start doing lens reviews again?

Frame color reviews would be nice as well.

Good job Dann ! thanks

Hi there, I just purchased a 30 years Sport Collection Radar Path, Frame : Polished Black, Lens : Jade Iridium. In the database, it states that this is 26-267, however on my box and lenses, it says 26-268. In the O-review database, 26-268 is white. I assume that the numbers are reversed, but I haven't got a white pair, so can't be sure.

Hmm, the Flak Jacket and Radar were the two in that range.

26-263, 26-264, 26-265 is Flak Jacket Grey, Black, White
26-266, 26-267, 26-268 is Radar Grey, Black, White

Seems to follow the pattern, but I would trust your box. I can switch these and hope we find a white one to confirm.

Edit: if you do a search on google images for "oakley 26-267" and "oakley 26-268" it pretty much confirms it. Thanks for the correction.

Is there anyway to update database entries? Just wanted to add images to some of the items that have none.

I need to update your access. I can do that later once I'm on a desktop

Thanks Dann. I'm kinda OCD so when I see stuff like that it bothers the hell out of me...lol

Should be all set the next time you log in.

I added a Retina Burn/Jade Iridium colorway to the Flak 2.0 XL collection, but it belongs in the Flak 2.0 collection. Can someone move it please?

thanks!

Yep, will do once I get on a desktop

I moved it, but then saw that there was already a Retina Burn/Jade in the non-XL list.

You've got Mainlink XL SKUS (end in 61) on the Mainlink page and no page for the Mainlink XL.

Thanks. I'll work on separating them. Might have been a situation where they were combined at first

Such a small one Dann, but I noticed it nonetheless. Ryan Arbabi one-off serial is five numerals, not six. Ryan said he most likely entered the serial in wrong on his collection page.

http://www.o-review.com/forum_detail.php?ID=11867

He had one job!

Is it just me or does the etching seem a little off?

When the etching was presented to us all those years ago, very few of us questioned it because "how can it be possible to fake such a thing????!!!" But the clarity that comes from over a decades' worth of experience and knowledge makes it seem a little suspicious. I know Ryan said the etching was done by somebody in Oakley UK (or something), but the font of the letters and numbers seem way off compared the typical font we see on X-metal etchings. The "1" for example seems assuredly different.

At this point, it's on the same level as having the Fandango in the database. Just a quirk that confuses people who try to get real answers, because trolling is life.

Not sure what's going on with the Disclosure page:
http://www.o-review.com/database_detail_model.php?ID=3093

but it shows a full frame plastic style, when the Oakley site has the Disclosure as a female wire aviator style:
https://www.oakley.com/en-us/product/W0OO4110

Maybe the reused the name?

Yeah, they must have. With so many female specific models coming out each year, it wouldn't be the first time, but typically they borrow from apparel or shoes, not other existing glasses. Odd. Guess I need to update the DB with the new model then.

Hey Dann,
Any way to list product missing pictures easily ?