3/4
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
TekDragon
Jason Johnson
Oct 27, 2005 11:52 PM
I agree with Bong that I don't think they'd fit me, but we'll have to see. Also, I think Dan's idea for a circuit board print or a rust/desert camo color would be cool, but I also agree with O.T.T. that the earstems are awesome, but the face is weak. It seems like Oakley has just given up on the front of glasses lately, and new styles are primarily defined by earstems. The front of these reminds me a lot of the front of the Monte Frio.
zev5740
Hip to be Square-O
Oct 28, 2005 12:13 AM
Actually, the only thing I don't like about them is the arms. Something about that gap bothers me. They should have either continued the thickness through that space or totally deleted the second flare out. I think it will look retarded on someones head.
kingphilbert
Philip Barket
Oct 28, 2005 12:19 AM
The front really is blah and basic. Think Arnette. It even looks just a little too Revo circa 1998 to me. It's no wonder the stems are overdone.

When I showed it to my manager at SGH, her only thought was the second flare resting on someones ears. They just look too far back.
american image
science wrapped in art dealer
Oct 28, 2005 1:05 AM
i think she pinpointed it correctly
LetsGoO
Mad Science
Oct 29, 2005 3:39 PM
They looked normal on JJ.
oogie
paul mcj
Oct 29, 2005 9:17 PM
Maybe the Oil Drum works like Legos ... I can stack 2-3 on top of each other by interlocking the earstems?!?
Dann
Dann Thombs
Oct 30, 2005 6:00 AM
They must have wanted to improve on the Oakley Head on the front page.
O.T.T.
James brown
Nov 19, 2005 1:41 AM
I got a UK release date of February 1st 2006 (same as the spike)
Dann
Dann Thombs
Dec 11, 2005 4:58 AM
Official sheet:


http://www.o-review.com/PDF/OilDrum.pdf
Dann
Dann Thombs
Dec 11, 2005 5:00 AM
cinder red...but what's with that price, did they forget the polarized part, or are we paying a premium for Lil Jon again?
EastCoast
E C
Dec 11, 2005 5:18 AM
Those are high prices for a 'frogskin' frame anyway. Weird.
obsession
OB session
Dec 11, 2005 5:34 AM
Whoa, that price is a bit more than I was told.
warwagon
Mike Bahr
Dec 11, 2005 5:43 AM
And another reason I won't be buying it.
obsession
OB session
Dec 11, 2005 12:28 PM
Mike, if you don't get em you won't be a true playa. You don't want to have to deal with that kind of stress do you? j/k
warwagon
Mike Bahr
Dec 11, 2005 12:37 PM
When ya put it like that Ob....what can a man say.
Dann
Dann Thombs
Dec 11, 2005 7:00 PM
How can you resist looking like this:
DisturbedEarth
Nik Gutscher
Dec 11, 2005 8:34 PM
I am excited to see this one....lookin' pretty cool.....HAS to be better than the last few designs....hopefully it won't be Spike-wrenchingly horrible....
banarno
Lee Silver
Dec 11, 2005 8:50 PM
Mike,I'm lovin what youve done to your hair.
You look so classy.....
obsession
OB session
Dec 11, 2005 9:01 PM
All Mike needs is an oakley afro pick and he's good to go.
LEX7
EJ Man
Dec 11, 2005 9:08 PM
gotta be a typo right? its more expensive than amber black polar option.

i like the sound of the brown smoke too.
Dann
Dann Thombs
Dec 11, 2005 10:11 PM
Phil, the Cinder Dog wasn't that much of a premium over the rest right. I understand maybe $10 like an FMJ coat has or something.
kingphilbert
Philip Barket
Dec 11, 2005 11:17 PM
No. it was considered a standard colorway like any paint app.

I just looked at the price there. That's a nasty jump and/or a hard typo to make.
american image
science wrapped in art dealer
Dec 12, 2005 5:16 PM
the rest is grey / bronze , non iridium ??
Dann
Dann Thombs
Dec 12, 2005 5:24 PM
hasn't everything lately
american image
science wrapped in art dealer
Dec 12, 2005 5:31 PM
sad but true :-(
3/4

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.